(1)

On 28 December 2001 the Commission adopted Decision 2001/936/EC (2) derogating from the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ to take account of the special situation of Greenland with regard to shrimps and prawns of the species Pandalus borealis. That derogation expired on 31 December 2006.

(2)

With letter of 26 June 2009, received on 6 July 2009, Greenland requested a new derogation from the rules of origin set out in Article 37 of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC in respect of an annual quantity of 2 500 tonnes of prepared and preserved shrimps and prawns of the species Pandalus borealis, to be exported from Greenland.

(3)

Greenland has based its request on the fact that during certain periods of the year there is a shortfall in supplies of originating shrimps and prawns.

(4)

Article 37 of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation provides that derogations from the rules of origin may be granted where justified by the development of existing industries or the creation of new industries in a country or territory.

(5)

The requested derogation is justified under Article 37(1) and (7) of Annex III to Decision 2001/822/EC, as regards the development of an existing industry in Greenland. As the derogation is being granted for products which involve actual processing and the local value added to the non-originating raw crustaceans used is at least 45 % of the value of the finished product, it will contribute to the development of an existing industry. The derogation is essential for the survival of one of its factories. Use of the derogation granted in 2001 remained extremely low (402 tonnes in 2002 and zero tonnes from January 2003 to December 2006). The derogation should therefore be granted for the same total annual quantity as covered by the derogation granted in 2001, i.e. 2 100 tonnes.

(6)

Subject to compliance with certain conditions relating to quantities, surveillance and duration, the derogation would not cause serious injury to an economic sector or an established industry of the Community or one or more of the Member States.

(7)

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (3) lays down rules for the management of tariff quotas. Those rules should be applied mutatis mutandis to the management of the quantity in respect of which the derogation is granted by this Decision.

(8)

Since the derogation is requested for a period starting on 1 August 2009, the derogation should be granted with effect from that date. In its letter of 26 June 2009 the Greenland authorities have suggested that the period granted would expire when Decision 2001/822/EC is no longer applicable, on 31 December 2013.

(9)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

—

‘Derogation — Decision 2009/776/EC’;

—

‘Dérogation — Décision 2009/776/CE’.