This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0581
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2024.
ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE – Earlier national figurative mark ECE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-581/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2024.
ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE – Earlier national figurative mark ECE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-581/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:47
Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 31 January 2024 –
ECE Group v EUIPO – ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat (ECE QUALITY OF LIFE)
(Case T‑581/22) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE – Earlier national figurative mark ECE – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 19, 20) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment – Complementary nature of the goods or services (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 21, 33, 34) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative marks ECE QUALITY OF LIFE and ECE (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 35-37, 43-49) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark enjoying a reputation – Extension of protection of the earlier mark with a reputation to dissimilar goods or services – Conditions – Link between the marks – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(5)) (see paragraphs 54-56) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Modification of the terms of the dispute as brought before the Board of Appeal – Not permissible (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 188) (see paragraph 62) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders ECE Group GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 463, 5.12.2022.