This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CJ0224
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023.
Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2022/110 – Annex III(c) – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Annex III(e) – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 – Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 – Fishing effort regime – Supplementary measures – Article 7(5) – Concept of ‘significant catches’ – Scientific advice – Article 7(3)(b) – Concept of ‘conservation measure’ – Obligation to state reasons – Discretion – Limits – Principle of proportionality.
Case C-224/22.
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023.
Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2022/110 – Annex III(c) – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Annex III(e) – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 – Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 – Fishing effort regime – Supplementary measures – Article 7(5) – Concept of ‘significant catches’ – Scientific advice – Article 7(3)(b) – Concept of ‘conservation measure’ – Obligation to state reasons – Discretion – Limits – Principle of proportionality.
Case C-224/22.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:891
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 –
Spain v Council (Supplementary conservation measures in the Western Mediterranean)
(Case C‑224/22) ( 1 )
(Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2022/110 – Annex III(c) – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Annex III(e) – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 – Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 – Fishing effort regime – Supplementary measures – Article 7(5) – Concept of ‘significant catches’ – Scientific advice – Article 7(3)(b) – Concept of ‘conservation measure’ – Obligation to state reasons – Discretion – Limits – Principle of proportionality)
1. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons – None (Art. 296, second para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c)) (see paragraphs 37, 38, 40-42, 44, 50) |
2. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Concept of significant catches – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation – Manifest error of assessment – None (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2019/1022, Art. 7(5); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c)) (see paragraphs 61-70, 83, 84) |
3. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Breach of principle of proportionality – None (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1380/2013, Art. 2(1); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c)) (see paragraphs 93, 95, 98-100) |
4. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons – None (Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e)) (see paragraphs 104, 105, 108, 109, 112) |
5. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Manifest error of assessment – None – Infringement of the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – None (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2019/1022, Art. 7(3)(b); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e)) (see paragraphs 122, 123, 127, 133, 137) |
6. |
Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Breach of principle of proportionality – None (Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e)) (see paragraphs 143-147) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
3. |
Order the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.