Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CJ0224

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023.
Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union.
Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2022/110 – Annex III(c) – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Annex III(e) – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 – Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 – Fishing effort regime – Supplementary measures – Article 7(5) – Concept of ‘significant catches’ – Scientific advice – Article 7(3)(b) – Concept of ‘conservation measure’ – Obligation to state reasons – Discretion – Limits – Principle of proportionality.
Case C-224/22.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:891

 Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 –
Spain v Council (Supplementary conservation measures in the Western Mediterranean)

(Case C‑224/22) ( 1 )

(Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2022/110 – Annex III(c) – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Annex III(e) – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Geographical subareas (GSAs) 1-2-5-6-7 – Article 43(2) and (3) TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2019/1022 – Fishing effort regime – Supplementary measures – Article 7(5) – Concept of ‘significant catches’ – Scientific advice – Article 7(3)(b) – Concept of ‘conservation measure’ – Obligation to state reasons – Discretion – Limits – Principle of proportionality)

1. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons – None

(Art. 296, second para., TFEU; Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c))

(see paragraphs 37, 38, 40-42, 44, 50)

2. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Concept of significant catches – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation – Manifest error of assessment – None

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2019/1022, Art. 7(5); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c))

(see paragraphs 61-70, 83, 84)

3. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing the maximum allowable fishing effort of European hake and of red mullet for demersal longliners – Breach of principle of proportionality – None

(European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1380/2013, Art. 2(1); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(c))

(see paragraphs 93, 95, 98-100)

4. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Infringement of the obligation to state reasons – None

(Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e))

(see paragraphs 104, 105, 108, 109, 112)

5. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Manifest error of assessment – None – Infringement of the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations – None

(European Parliament and Council Regulation 2019/1022, Art. 7(3)(b); Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e))

(see paragraphs 122, 123, 127, 133, 137)

6. 

Fisheries – Conservation of the resources of the sea – System of fishing quotas – Allocation of fishing opportunities among the Member States – Council’s margin of discretion – Judicial review – Limits – Fixing maximum catch limits for red shrimp – Breach of principle of proportionality – None

(Council Regulation 2022/110, Annex III(e))

(see paragraphs 143-147)

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

3. 

Order the European Commission to bear its own costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.

Top