Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TJ0118

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2022.
OM v European Commission.
Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Position of Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Legitimate expectation – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment.
Case T-118/22.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:849

 Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2022 –
OM v Commission

(Case T‑118/22) ( 1 )

(Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Vacancy notice – Rejection of application – Appointment of another candidate – Position of Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board – Obligation to state reasons – Infringement of the vacancy notice – Legitimate expectation – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment)

1. 

Officials – Decision adversely affecting an official – Rejection of an application – Obligation to state reasons at the latest at the stage of rejection of the complaint – Scope – Observance of the secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings – Statement of reasons limited to communication of the marks awarded and to the selection board’s written assessments regarding the quality of the candidate’s performance – Whether permissible

(Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 25, second para., 90 and 91 and Annex III, Art. 6)

(see paragraphs 23-26, 33)

2. 

Officials – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure – Arrangements for and content of tests – Selection Board’s discretion – Judicial review – Limits

(Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Arts 2(a) and 12)

(see paragraphs 38, 44-48)

3. 

Officials – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Assessment of candidates’ abilities – Consideration of comparative merits – Selection Board’s discretion – Judicial review – Limits

(Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Arts 2(a) and 12)

(see paragraphs 49, 50, 74, 75, 78)

4. 

Officials – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure – Arrangements for and content of tests – Oral tests – Selection Board’s discretion – Scope – Obligation to put all questions prepared beforehand to all candidates – None – Obligation to ensure a precise duration for interviews – None – Breach of the principle of equal treatment – None

(Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Arts 2(a) and 12)

(see paragraphs 61-63, 69, 70)

Operative part

The Court:

1. 

Dismisses the action;

2. 

Orders OM to pay the costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.

Top