This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0065
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.
PS v European Investment Bank.
Civil service – EIB staff – Social security – Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease – Total and permanent invalidity – Occupational nature of the disease – Contract concluded with an insurance company – Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB.
Case T-65/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.
PS v European Investment Bank.
Civil service – EIB staff – Social security – Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease – Total and permanent invalidity – Occupational nature of the disease – Contract concluded with an insurance company – Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB.
Case T-65/22.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:107
Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2023 –
PS v EIB
(Case T‑65/22) ( 1 )
(Civil service – EIB staff – Social security – Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease – Total and permanent invalidity – Occupational nature of the disease – Contract concluded with an insurance company – Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB)
|
1. |
Officials – Staff of the European Investment Bank – Social security – Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease – Insurance contract concluded between the Bank and an insurance company – Processing of a claim for recognition of the occupational nature of a disease by the insurance company – Remaining obligations to be borne by the Bank– Scope – Limits (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts 31 and 34; Staff Regulations of the European Investment Bank, Art. 33a) (see paragraphs 40, 41, 46-55, 57, 59, 61-65) |
|
2. |
Actions brought by officials – Staff of the European Investment Bank – Admissibility criteria – Compliance with the prior administrative procedure (Art. 270 TFEU; Staff Regulations of the European Investment Bank, Arts 41 and 41a) (see paragraphs 69-72, 77) |
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders PS to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.