Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TJ0033

    Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023.
    Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTO INSÍGNIA – Earlier EU word mark INSIGNIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-33/22.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:316

     Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 June 2023 –
    Vallegre v EUIPO – Joseph Phelps Vineyards (PORTO INSÍGNIA)

    (Case T‑33/22) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTO INSÍGNIA – Earlier EU word mark INSIGNIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 19, 69, 74, 80)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 24, 25)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word marks PORTO INSÍGNIA et INSIGNIA

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 26, 31, 44, 50, 59, 64, 65, 70, 73, 79, 81)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Wine sector

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 32, 48, 49, 55-57, 63)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of which a trade mark is composed

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 34, 45)

    6. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Elements of a trade mark having a descriptive character – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 35, 36)

    7. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Pleas in law

    (Art. 263 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47)

    (see paragraph 42)

    8. 

    EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Legality – Examination by the EU judicature – Criteria

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009)

    (see paragraph 46)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Vallegre, Vinhos do Porto, SA to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 119, 14.3.2022.

    Top