Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0102

    Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.
    Bastion Holding BV and Others v European Commission.
    State aid – Measures to support small and medium-sized enterprises in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary framework for State aid measures – Obligation to state reasons.
    Case T-102/21.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:243

     Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023 –
    Bastion Holding and Others v Commission

    (Case T‑102/21) ( 1 )

    (State aid – Measures to support small and medium-sized enterprises in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Netherlands – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary framework for State aid measures – Obligation to state reasons)

    1. 

    State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid capable of being regarded as compatible with the internal market – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Aid scheme seeking to grant support to undertakings for their fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak – Financial support for small and medium-sized enterprises only – Assessment of the compatibility with the internal market – Criteria – Objective of the aid scheme – Proportionality of the aid

    (Art. 107(3)(b) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 26-31, 33-36)

    2. 

    Judicial proceedings – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Plea raised for the first time at the reply stage – Inadmissibility

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 84(2))

    (see paragraph 43)

    3. 

    State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid capable of being regarded as compatible with the internal market – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Aid scheme seeking to grant support to undertakings for their fixed costs in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak – Financial support entailing a difference in treatment between certain undertakings – Justification – Breach of the principle of equal treatment – None

    (Art. 107(3)(b) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 46-54)

    4. 

    State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Aid capable of being regarded as compatible with the internal market – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Aid measure that does not make good the entirety of the damage caused by the exceptional occurrence – Whether permissible

    (Art. 107(3)(b) TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 55, 57)

    5. 

    State aid – Commission decision not to raise objections to an aid scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Scope – Consideration of the context and all the legal rules governing the matter

    (Arts 107(3)(b) and 296 TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 64-70)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Bastion Holding BV and the other applicant parties whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

    3. 

    Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 182, 10.5.2021.

    Top