Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0093

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2022.
    Creaticon d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE – Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-93/21.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:280

     Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2022 –
    Creaticon v EUIPO – Paul Hartmann (SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE)

    (Case T‑93/21) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – EU figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE – Earlier national word mark SKINTEGRITY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Decisions of EUIPO – Observance of the rights of the defence – Scope of the principle

    (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41(2)(a); European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), second sentence)

    (see paras 15, 16)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Appeal brought against a decision of a unit of the Office ruling at first instance and referred to the Board of Appeal – Functional continuity between those two bodies – Examination of the appeal by the Board of Appeal – Scope

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 71(1))

    (see paras 18, 19)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 28, 29, 95)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Level of attention of the public

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 34)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative mark SK SKINTEGRA THE RARE MOLECULE and word mark SKINTEGRITY

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 36, 56, 83, 87, 94, 98-100)

    6. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment – Complementary nature of the goods or services

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 37, 54)

    7. 

    EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Legality – Examination by the EU judicature – Criteria

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001)

    (see para. 44)

    8. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 57-61, 68)

    9. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Similarity of the marks concerned – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of which a trade mark is composed

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 67)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Creaticon d.o.o. to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.

    Top