Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CO0546

    Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2023.
    Fundacja Instytut na rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris v European Parliament.
    Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer practicing in the same firm as the applicant’s president.
    Case C-546/21 P.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:123

     Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 February 2023 –
    Fundacja Instytut na rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris v Parliament

    (Case C‑546/21 P)

    (Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer practicing in the same firm as the applicant’s president)

    Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Conditions relating to a signatory – Status of a third party in relation to the parties – Applicant represented by a lawyer providing legal services in the legal department of that party and collaborating with the president of that party in the same law firm – Non-compliance with the requirement of independence – Absence

    (Statute of the Court of Justice, Article 19, third para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Article 51(1))

    (see paragraphs 29-43)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The order of the General Court of the European Union of 5 July 2021, Fundacja Instytut na rzecz Kultury Prawnej Ordo Iuris v Parliament (T‑42/21, not published, EU:T:2021:481) is set aside.

    2. 

    Case T‑42/21 is referred back to the General Court of the European Union.

    3. 

    The costs are reserved.

    Top