Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CO0642

    Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2020.
    BS v European Parliament.
    Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Officials — Avis de modification des droits à pension — Dependent child allowance — Education allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Actual maintenance of the child — Annexe VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 2 — Recovery of undue payments — Manifest error of assessment — Right to sound administration — Action for annulment.
    Case C-642/19 P.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:32

     Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2020 — BS v Parliament

    (Case C‑642/19 P)

    (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Officials — Avis de modification des droits à pension — Dependent child allowance — Education allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Actual maintenance of the child — Annexe VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 2 — Recovery of undue payments — Manifest error of assessment — Right to sound administration — Action for annulment)

    1. 

    Judicial proceedings — Action before the General Court — Possibility of a second exchange of pleadings — Discretion of the Court

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 83)

    (see para. 5)

    2. 

    Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure — Infringement of the right to effective judicial protection — None

    (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126)

    (see para. 5)

    3. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2))

    (see para. 5)

    4. 

    Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility

    (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1))

    (see para. 5)

    Operative part

    1. 

    The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.

    2. 

    BS shall bear its own costs.

    Top