This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0642
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2020.
BS v European Parliament.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Officials — Avis de modification des droits à pension — Dependent child allowance — Education allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Actual maintenance of the child — Annexe VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 2 — Recovery of undue payments — Manifest error of assessment — Right to sound administration — Action for annulment.
Case C-642/19 P.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2020.
BS v European Parliament.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Officials — Avis de modification des droits à pension — Dependent child allowance — Education allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Actual maintenance of the child — Annexe VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 2 — Recovery of undue payments — Manifest error of assessment — Right to sound administration — Action for annulment.
Case C-642/19 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:32
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2020 — BS v Parliament
(Case C‑642/19 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Officials — Avis de modification des droits à pension — Dependent child allowance — Education allowance — Child suffering from an infirmity preventing her from earning a livelihood — Actual maintenance of the child — Annexe VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 2 — Recovery of undue payments — Manifest error of assessment — Right to sound administration — Action for annulment)
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Action before the General Court — Possibility of a second exchange of pleadings — Discretion of the Court (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 83) (see para. 5) |
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure — Infringement of the right to effective judicial protection — None (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126) (see para. 5) |
3. |
Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissibility (Art. 256 TFEU; Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169(2)) (see para. 5) |
4. |
Appeal — Grounds — Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal — Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170(1)) (see para. 5) |
Operative part
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded. |
2. |
BS shall bear its own costs. |