This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TJ0323
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Fomanu AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a butterfly — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-323/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019.
Fomanu AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a butterfly — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-323/18.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019 –
Fomanu v EUIPO — Fujifilm Imaging Germany (Representation of a butterfly)
(Case T‑323/18)
(EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a butterfly — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — Similar requirements for submissions made in support of a plea (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para. and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d)) (see para. 17) |
2. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Causes of revocation — Absence of genuine use of a trade mark — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Genuine use — Concept — Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paras 23-28) |
3. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Causes of revocation — Absence of genuine use of a trade mark — Figurative mark representing a butterfly (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1) and 58(1)(a)) (see paras 38, 39, 44, 63-65) |
4. |
EU trade mark — Surrender, revocation and invalidity — Examination of the application — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Partial use — Effect — Concept of ‘part of the goods or services’ covered by the registration (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 18(1), 58(1)(a) and (2)) (see paras 47-50) |
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2018 (Case R 2241/2016-2) relating to revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Imaging Germany and Fomanu.
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Fomanu AG to pay the costs. |