This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CO0370
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2018.
Uniunea Naţională a Barourilor din România v Marcel - Vasile Holunga.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rule of Procedure — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Compulsory nature of its jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-370/18.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2018.
Uniunea Naţională a Barourilor din România v Marcel - Vasile Holunga.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rule of Procedure — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Compulsory nature of its jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Case C-370/18.
Court reports – general
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2018 — Holunga
(Case C‑370/18)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rule of Procedure — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Compulsory nature of its jurisdiction — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Reference to the Court — National court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU — Definition — Tribunalul de Arbitraj Instituţionalizat Galaţi (Institutional Arbitration Tribunal, Galați, Romania) — Not included
(Art. 267 TFEU)
(see paras 11, 13, 14, 15, operative part.)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunalul de Arbitraj Instituţionalizat Galaţi (Institutional Arbitration Tribunal, Galați, Romania), by decision of 7 May 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.