EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CO0187
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2017.
Rafaela Alandžak and Others v EUROHERC osiguranje – dioničko društvo za osiguranje imovine i osoba i druge poslove osiguranja.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.
Case C-187/17.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2017.
Rafaela Alandžak and Others v EUROHERC osiguranje – dioničko društvo za osiguranje imovine i osoba i druge poslove osiguranja.
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice.
Case C-187/17.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 — Alandžak
(Case C‑187/17)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling—Admissibility—Need to provide the Court with sufficient information on the factual and legislative context—Scope
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 94)
(see paras 9-13)
Operative part
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Općinski Sud u Vukovaru (Municipal Court of Vukovar, Croatia), by decision of 5 April 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.