This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TO0582
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2017.
Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann v European Commission.
Civil service — Officials — Career reconstruction — Refusal to promote — Inter-institutional transfer — Classification in grade — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period — Inadmissibility.
Case T-582/16.
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2017.
Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann v European Commission.
Civil service — Officials — Career reconstruction — Refusal to promote — Inter-institutional transfer — Classification in grade — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period — Inadmissibility.
Case T-582/16.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2017 — Vankerckhoven-Kahmann v Commission
(Case T‑582/16)
(Civil service — Officials — Career reconstruction — Refusal to promote — Inter-institutional transfer — Classification in grade — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Reasonable period — Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Actions brought by officials—Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations—Definition—Request for information—Not included (Staff Regulations, Art. 90(1)) (see paras 32-35) |
|
2. |
Actions brought by officials—Acts adversely affecting an official—Definition—Career sheet in the computerised individual file showing maintenance in grade—Not included (Staff Regulations, Arts 90(2), and 91(1)) (see para. 42) |
|
3. |
Officials—Reports procedure—Appraisal report—Nature and purpose (Staff Regulations, Art. 43) (see para. 43) |
|
4. |
Actions brought by officials—Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations—Period for lodging—Reasonable time—Criteria for assessment (Staff Regulations, Art. 90(1)) (see paras 47, 51, 57-59, 61, 62, 72, 75) |
|
5. |
Actions brought by officials—Request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations—Period for lodging—Reasonable time—To be considered of the Court’s own motion—Administration replying on the substance to a late request—Irrelevant (Staff Regulations, Art. 90(1)) (see paras 48, 77) |
Re:
ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision of 17 April 2015 refusing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 9 November 2015 rejecting her complaint lodged on 17 July 2015.
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Ms Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |