This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016CO0610
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 April 2017.
Anastasia-Soultana Gaki v European Parliament.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Lack of competence of the Committee on Petitions — Complaint — Action for annulment and for failure to act — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-610/16 P.
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 April 2017.
Anastasia-Soultana Gaki v European Parliament.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Lack of competence of the Committee on Petitions — Complaint — Action for annulment and for failure to act — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.
Case C-610/16 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Gaki v Parliament
(Case C‑610/16 P)
(Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Petition addressed to the European Parliament — Decision to take no further action — Lack of competence of the Committee on Petitions — Complaint — Action for annulment and for failure to act — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
|
1. |
Appeal—Grounds—Error of law relied on not identified—Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 168(1)(d) and 169) (see paras 13-14) |
|
2. |
Appeal—Grounds—Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence—Inadmissibility—Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence—Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 18) |
Operative part
|
1) |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2) |
Mrs Anastasia-Soultana Gaki is ordered to pay the costs. |