Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CO0345

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2016.
Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union.
Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 — Import of ferro-silicon originating, inter alia, in Russia — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 11(3) and (9) — Partial interim review.
Case C-345/15 P.

Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 June 2016 — CHEMK and KF v Council

(Case C‑345/15 P) ( 1 )

‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 — Import of ferro-silicon originating, inter alia, in Russia — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 11(3) and (9) — Partial interim review’

1. 

Appeal — Grounds — Grounds which are manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded — Dismissal at any point, by reasoned order, without an oral procedure (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see para. 21)

2. 

Appeal — Grounds — Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part — Invalid plea in law (see para. 26)

3. 

Common commercial policy — Protection against dumping — Partial interim review of an anti-dumping duty — Verification of the need to maintain anti-dumping measures — Retrospective and prospective analyses (Council Regulation No 1225/2009, Art. 11(3)) (see paras 31)

Operative part

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie ferrosplavy OAO (KF) are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

3.

The European Commission is to bear its own costs.


( 1 ) OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.

Top