1. 

Actions for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Action brought against an act imposing restrictive measures on the applicant — Repeal of the contested act in the course of the proceedings — Declaration that no need to adjudicate — Not permissible — Applicant maintaining an interest in obtaining recognition that the contested act unlawful (Art. 263 TFEU; Council Decisions 2013/661/CFSP and 2015/1863/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012 and No 2015/1862) (see para. 12)

2. 

Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Assessment of the duty to state reasons by reference to the circumstances of the case — No need to specify all the relevant factual and legal elements (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decisions 2010/413/CFSP and 2013/661/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012 and No 1154/2013) (see paras 23, 24)

3. 

Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Minimum requirements (Art. 296 TFEU; Council Decisions 2010/413/CFSP and 2013/661/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012 and No 1154/2013) (see para. 25)

4. 

Actions for annulment — Grounds — Lack of or inadequate statement of reasons — Error of assessment — Distinction (Arts 263 TFEU and 296 TFEU) (see paras 30, 31)

5. 

Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 44)

6. 

Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds of persons, entities or bodies engaged in or supporting nuclear proliferation — Logistical support for the Iranian Government — Definition — Activity likely, by its quantative and qualitative significance, to favour nuclear proliferation by allowing the Iranian Government to meet specific logistical needs — Inclusion (Council Decisions 2010/413/CFSP and 2013/661/CFSP; Council Regulations No 267/2012 and No 1154/2013) (see paras 52-58)

7. 

Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court — Inadmissibility (see para. 63)

1. 

Dismisses the appeal;

2. 

Orders Iranian Offshore Engineering & Construction Co. to pay the costs.