EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014CO0224
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2016.
Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.
Case C-224/14 P.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2016.
Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.
Case C-224/14 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2016 —
Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO
(Case C‑224/14 P) ( *1 )
‛Appeal — EU trade mark — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded’
Appeal — Grounds — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence — Inadmissibility — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 181) (see para. 27)
Operative part:
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG shall pay the costs. |
( *1 ) OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.