This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CJ0414
Bolloré v Commission
Bolloré v Commission
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bolloré v Commission
(Case C‑414/12 P)
‛Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence’
|
1. |
Competition — Administrative procedure — Observance of the rights of the defence — Excessive duration of the administrative procedure — Disappearance of the evidence relevant for the rights of defence to be exercised — Burden of proof — Obligations incumbent on a diligent undertaking (Council Regulation No 1/2003) (see paras 63, 64, 73) |
|
2. |
Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 78) |
|
3. |
Competition — Administrative procedure — Obligations of the Commission — Duty to act within a reasonable time — Annulment of the decision finding an infringement by reason of excessive duration of the procedure — Condition — Adverse effect on the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned (Council Regulation No 1/2003) (see paras 84, 85) |
|
4. |
Appeals — Grounds — Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part — Invalid plea in law (see para. 99) |
|
5. |
Judicial proceedings — Duration of the proceedings before the General Court — Reasonable time — Proceedings concerning an infringement of the competition rules — Failure to act within a reasonable time — Consequences (Arts 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.) (see paras 105-107) |
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 in Case T‑372/10 Bolloré v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or amendment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4160 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/36.212 — Carbonless paper) — Decision taken following annulment of a first decision — Attribution of liability for the infringement to the parent company as direct perpetrator — Fine — Lawfulness of infringements and penalties — Equal treatment — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence.
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal. |
Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 — Bolloré v Commission
(Case C‑414/12 P)
‛Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence’
|
1. |
Competition — Administrative procedure — Observance of the rights of the defence — Excessive duration of the administrative procedure — Disappearance of the evidence relevant for the rights of defence to be exercised — Burden of proof — Obligations incumbent on a diligent undertaking (Council Regulation No 1/2003) (see paras 63, 64, 73) |
|
2. |
Appeals — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256(1) TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see para. 78) |
|
3. |
Competition — Administrative procedure — Obligations of the Commission — Duty to act within a reasonable time — Annulment of the decision finding an infringement by reason of excessive duration of the procedure — Condition — Adverse effect on the rights of defence of the undertakings concerned (Council Regulation No 1/2003) (see paras 84, 85) |
|
4. |
Appeals — Grounds — Plea against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support the operative part — Invalid plea in law (see para. 99) |
|
5. |
Judicial proceedings — Duration of the proceedings before the General Court — Reasonable time — Proceedings concerning an infringement of the competition rules — Failure to act within a reasonable time — Consequences (Arts 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, second para.) (see paras 105-107) |
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 June 2012 in Case T‑372/10 Bolloré v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or amendment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4160 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/36.212 — Carbonless paper) — Decision taken following annulment of a first decision — Attribution of liability for the infringement to the parent company as direct perpetrator — Fine — Lawfulness of infringements and penalties — Equal treatment — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence.
Operative part
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders Bolloré to pay the costs of the present appeal. |