Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62005TJ0042

    Summary of the Judgment

    Keywords
    Subject of the case
    Operative part

    Keywords

    European Communities – Institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001) (see paras 67-69)

    2. European Communities – Institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 (Art. 253 EC; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001) (see paras 71-83, 85-97)

    3. Actions for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 114-116)

    4. European Communities – Institutions – Right of public access to documents – Regulation No 1049/2001 (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 1049/2001, Art. 4(1)(a) and (3), second para.) (see paras 124-126)

    Subject of the case

    Re:

    APPLICATION for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 19 November 2004 partially refusing the applicant access to certain preparatory documents in respect of the legislation on genetically-modified organisms.

    Operative part

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. Declares that there is no further need to rule on the lawfulness of the Commission’s decision of 19 November 2004 partially refusing Ms Rhiannon Williams access to certain preparatory documents in respect of the legislation on genetically-modified organisms in so far as it may include an implied refusal of access to preparatory documents from the Commission’s Directorate-General (DG) for Trade relating to the adoption of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC;

    2. Annuls the Commission’s decision of 19 November 2004 in so far as it impliedly refused access to preparatory documents relating to the adoption of Directive 2001/18 other than those produced by the Trade DG;

    3. Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

    4. Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay one half of those incurred by Ms Williams.

    Top