This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62004CJ0423
Summary of the Judgment
Summary of the Judgment
1. Social policy – Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security –Directive 79/7
(Council Directive 79/7, Art. 4(1))
2. Preliminary rulings – Interpretation – Effect of interpretative judgments ratione temporis
(Art. 234 EC)
1. Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security is to be interpreted as precluding legislation which denies a person who, in accordance with the conditions laid down by national law, has undergone male-to-female gender reassignment entitlement to a retirement pension on the ground that she has not reached the age of 65, when she would have been entitled to such a pension at the age of 60 had she been held to be a woman as a matter of national law.
The scope of Directive 79/7 cannot thus be confined simply to discrimination based on the fact that a person is of one or other sex. In view of its purpose and the nature of the rights which it seeks to safeguard, the scope of that directive is also such as to apply to discrimination arising from the gender reassignment of the person concerned.
(see paras 24, 38, operative part 1)
2. It is only exceptionally that, in application of a general principle of legal certainty which is inherent in the Community legal order, the Court may decide to restrict the right to rely upon a provision it has interpreted with a view to calling in question legal relations established in good faith.
Moreover, the financial consequences which might ensue for a Member State from a preliminary ruling do not in themselves justify limiting the temporal effects of the ruling.
(see paras 40-41)