EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0014
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2018.#Apimab Laboratoires and Others v European Commission.#Consumer protection — Setting of maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food supplements — Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 — Risk analysis — Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-14/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2018.
Apimab Laboratoires and Others v European Commission.
Consumer protection — Setting of maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food supplements — Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 — Risk analysis — Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Principle of non-discrimination.
Case T-14/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2018.
Apimab Laboratoires and Others v European Commission.
Consumer protection — Setting of maximum levels for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food supplements — Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 — Risk analysis — Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Principle of non-discrimination.
Case T-14/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:524