This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TJ0882
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.#Sipral World, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-882/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.
Sipral World, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-882/16.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 June 2018.
Sipral World, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark DOLFINA — No genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).
Case T-882/16.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2018:336