Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document C2006/326/131

Case T-304/06: Action brought on 10 November 2006 — Reber v OHIM (Mozart)

IO C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 61–61 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
30/12/2006; Dáta foilsithe
Author:
Cúirt Chéadchéime
Form:
Faisnéis bhreithiúnach

30.12.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/61

Action brought on 10 November 2006 — Reber v OHIM (Mozart)

(Case T-304/06)

(2006/C 326/131)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Paul Reber GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Reichenhall, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG (Kilchberg, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 8 September 2006 in appeal case R 97/2005-2;

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘Mozart’ for goods in Class 30 (Community trade mark No 21 071).

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG.

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark concerned.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Infringement of the duty under Article 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) to state the reasons on which a decision is based, infringement by the Office of its duty under Article 74(1) of Regulation No 40/94 to examine the facts of its own motion, infringement of the principle of good faith and infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94.

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

Top