EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/281/59

Case T-96/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2006 — Monte di Massima v OHIM — Höfferle Internationale (Valle della Luna) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for figurative Community trade mark Valle della Luna — Earlier national figurative mark VALLE DE LA LUNA — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Article 15(2)(a), and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

IO C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 34–34 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

18.11.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/34


Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2006 — Monte di Massima v OHIM — Höfferle Internationale (Valle della Luna)

(Case T-96/05) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for figurative Community trade mark Valle della Luna - Earlier national figurative mark VALLE DE LA LUNA - Proof of use of the earlier mark - Article 15(2)(a), and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 281/59)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Monte di Massima SAS di Pruneddu Leonardo & C. (Viddalba, Italy) (represented by: E. Masu and P. Pittalis, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M.L. Capostagno, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: J.M. Höfferle Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: G. Brugmann, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 Noevember 2004 (Case R 269/2004-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Monte di Massima SAS di Pruneddu Leonardo & C. and J.M. Höfferle Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH.

Operative part

The Court

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and by the intervener.


(1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005


Top