Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/074/49

    Case T-460/05: Action brought on 29 December 2005 — Bang & Olufsen/OHIM

    IO C 74, 25.3.2006, p. 26–26 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    25/03/2006; Dáta foilsithe
    Author:
    Cúirt Chéadchéime
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach

    25.3.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 74/26

    Action brought on 29 December 2005 — Bang & Olufsen/OHIM

    (Case T-460/05)

    (2006/C 74/49)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Bang & Olufsen AS (Struer, Denmark) [represented by: K. Wallberg, lawyer]

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    —

    The decision taken by the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 22 October 2005 in case No. R0497/2005-1 be annulled and

    —

    the defendant pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional mark in form of a vertical pencil-shaped loudspeaker on a low pedestal for goods in classes 9 and 20 — application No 3 354 371

    Decision of the examiner: Refusal of the application for all the claimed goods

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: The mark is in accordance with Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 inherently distinctive for all the goods covered by the application and if not so, it has acquired distinctiveness through use in accordance with Article 7(3) of the Regulation.

    Top