Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TN0416

    Case T-416/21: Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)

    IO C 357, 6.9.2021, p. 27–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.9.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 357/27


    Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)

    (Case T-416/21)

    (2021/C 357/42)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ITINERANT — Application for registration No 17 946 859

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 May 2021 in Case R 997/2020-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision;

    order EUIPO to grant European Union trade mark No 17 946 853 for Classes 18 and 25;

    order [EUIPO] to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    Incorrect exclusion of the evidence submitted before the Board of Appeal;

    Misapplication of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    Misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.


    Top