Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-644/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.
Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-644/21.

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2022.
Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS – Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-644/21.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:847