This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0323
Case C-323/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 May 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B.
Case C-323/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 May 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B.
Case C-323/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 May 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B.
IO C 320, 9.8.2021, p. 28–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
9.8.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 320/28 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 May 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v B.
(Case C-323/21)
(2021/C 320/28)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Raad van State
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
Respondent: B.
Questions referred
1. |
|
2. |
If Question 1 must be answered in the affirmative, must Article 27(1) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, read in the light of recital 19 of that regulation, be interpreted as precluding an applicant for international protection from successfully arguing, in the context of an appeal against a transfer decision, that that transfer cannot proceed because the time limit for a previously agreed transfer between two Member States (in this case, Germany and Italy) has expired? |