Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62019TN0328

    Case T-328/19: Action brought on 29 May 2019 — ‘Scorify’ v EUIPO — Scor (SCORIFY)

    IO C 246, 22.7.2019, p. 40–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    29/05/2019
    Date lodged:
    29/05/2019
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Defendant:
    Oifig Maoine Intleachtúla an Aontais Eorpaigh
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    22.7.2019   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 246/40

    Action brought on 29 May 2019 — ‘Scorify’ v EUIPO — Scor (SCORIFY)

    (Case T-328/19)

    (2019/C 246/42)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant:‘Scorify’ UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: V. Viešūnaitė, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Scor SE (Paris, France)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark in colours red, white and dark blue SCORIFY — Application for registration No 16 214 521

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2019 in Case R 1639/2018-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    carefully consider the applicant’s original pleadings and its grounds of action, and alter the Decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office, stating that the applicant’s appeal submitted to the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office was justified, thus, the opposition had to be rejected;

    —

    order the other party to bear all the costs paid and incurred by the applicant within the meaning of Articles 134, 139, 140, 190 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top