This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0564
Case T-564/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark LIBERTADOR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Due notification — Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed — Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
Case T-564/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark LIBERTADOR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Due notification — Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed — Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
Case T-564/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark LIBERTADOR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Due notification — Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed — Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
IO C 230, 13.7.2020, p. 35–35
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
13.7.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 230/35 |
Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR)
(Case T-564/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark LIBERTADOR - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Due notification - Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed - Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
(2020/C 230/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Antonio Lozano Arana (Cali, Colombia), Daniel Simon Benmaor (Marseilles, France), Marion Esther Benmaor (Marseilles), Valérie Brigitte Danielle Servant (Marrakesh, Morocco) (represented by: M. Angelier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Coltejer SA (Itagüí, Colombia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2019 (Case R 2482/2018-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Coltejer and Mr Albert Benmaor and Mr Lozano Arana.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Mr Antonio Lozano Arana, Mr Daniel Simon Benmaor, Ms Marion Esther Benmaor and Ms Valérie Brigitte Danielle Servant to pay the costs. |