This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0505
Case T-505/17: Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Inverni and Others v Commission and SRB
Case T-505/17: Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Inverni and Others v Commission and SRB
Case T-505/17: Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Inverni and Others v Commission and SRB
IO C 347, 16.10.2017, p. 37–38
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.10.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 347/37 |
Action brought on 4 August 2017 — Inverni and Others v Commission and SRB
(Case T-505/17)
(2017/C 347/48)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicants: Inverni, SL (Madrid, Spain), Inverindesa, SL (Madrid) and Isaac Ignacio Fernández Fernández (Oviedo, Spain) (represented by: B. Gutiérrez de la Roza Pérez, P. Rubio Escobar, R. Ruiz de la Torre Esporrín and B. Fernández García, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission and Single Resolution Board
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should annul:
— |
Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board taken at its executive session of 7 June 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español S.A.; |
— |
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 endorsing the resolution scheme for Banco Popular Español. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.