Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0463

    Case T-463/17: Action brought on 25 July 2017 — Raise Conseil v EUIPO — Raizers (RAISE)

    IO C 330, 2.10.2017, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    25/07/2017
    Date lodged:
    25/07/2017
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Fraincis
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    2.10.2017   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 330/11

    Action brought on 25 July 2017 — Raise Conseil v EUIPO — Raizers (RAISE)

    (Case T-463/17)

    (2017/C 330/14)

    Language in which the application was lodged: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Raise Conseil (Paris, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Raizers (Paris)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘RAISE’ — European Union trade mark No 11 508 967

    Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1606/2016-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision to the extent that it declared invalid EU trade mark RAISE No 11 508 967 for lack of distinctiveness within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR in relation to the following services in Class 36: ‘Financial affairs; financial information; financial management; financing services; financial analysis; mutual funds and capital investments; financial consultancy; financial sponsorship; financing (loan) business; financial evaluation (insurance, banking, real estate); setting up and investment of funds; factoring; issue of tokens of value; stock exchange quotations; securities brokerage; monetary affairs; exchanging money; fiscal valuations and assessments; real estate affairs; insurance; provident fund services; direct banking; issuing of travellers’ cheques or credit cards; real estate appraisal; real estate management’;

    —

    order the company Raizers, applicant in the action for a declaration of invalidity, to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the company Raise Conseil, including representation expenses.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top