This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TA0091
Case T-91/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Sick leave — Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment — Unauthorised absence — Article 60 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Principle of good administration)
Case T-91/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Sick leave — Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment — Unauthorised absence — Article 60 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Principle of good administration)
Case T-91/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Sick leave — Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment — Unauthorised absence — Article 60 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Principle of good administration)
IO C 131, 8.4.2019, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 14/02/2019
- Date of signature:
- 14/02/2019
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
|
8.4.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 131/41 |
Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — L v Parliament
(Case T-91/17) (1)
(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Sick leave - Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment - Unauthorised absence - Article 60 of the Staff Regulations - Duty of care - Principle of good administration)
(2019/C 131/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: L (represented by: I. Coutant Peyre, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 31 August 2016 concerning unauthorised absences of the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders L to pay the costs. |
