This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017CN0393
Case C-393/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein
Case C-393/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein
Case C-393/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein
IO C 300, 11.9.2017, p. 19–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 30/06/2017
- Date lodged:
- 30/06/2017
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Ollainnis
- Type of procedure:
- Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Submits a preliminary question about 32005L0029
- Submits a preliminary question about 32006L0123
- Submits a preliminary question about 32006L0123 airteagal 10 mír 2 pointe (c)
- Submits a preliminary question about 32006L0123 airteagal 9 mír 1 pointe (c)
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
11.9.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 300/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 30 June 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein
(Case C-393/17)
(2017/C 300/23)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hof van beroep Antwerpen
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Openbaar Ministerie
Respondents: Freddy Lucien Magdalena Kirschstein, Thierry Frans Adeline Kirschstein
Questions referred
|
1. |
Must Directive 2005/29/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013 which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely, the need to ensure a high standard of education whereby it must be possible to check whether the predefined quality requirements have effectively been met? |
|
2. |
Must Directive 2006/123/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market be interpreted as precluding the provision in Article II.75(6) of the Codex of Higher Education of 11 October 2013, which imposes a general prohibition on non-accredited educational institutions using the designation ‘master’ on the diplomas they award, where that prohibition is aimed at safeguarding a matter in the general interest, namely the protection of recipients of services? |
|
3. |
Does the criminal provision applicable to educational institutions not recognised by the Flemish Government which award ‘masters’’ diplomas pass the proportionality test in Articles 9(1)(c) and 10(2)(c) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market? |
