Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TN0479

    Case T-479/16: Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)

    IO C 383, 17.10.2016, p. 22–23 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    17.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 383/22


    Action brought on 30 August 2016 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)

    (Case T-479/16)

    (2016/C 383/31)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler, A. Stolz, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘AROMASENSATIONS’ — Application for registration No 14 198 824

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 in Case R 2482/2015-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismisses the appeal insofar as it is based on Article 7(1)(b);

    order EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law

    Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

    Infringement of principles of equal treatment and sound administration.


    Top