Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016CN0452

    Case C-452/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Krzystof Marek Poltorak

    IO C 383, 17.10.2016, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    16/08/2016
    Date lodged:
    16/08/2016
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Ollainnis
    Type of procedure:
    Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32002F0584 airteagal 1 mír 1
    • Submits a preliminary question about 32002F0584 airteagal 6 mír 1
    Link

    17.10.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 383/7

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Krzystof Marek Poltorak

    (Case C-452/16)

    (2016/C 383/09)

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Rechtbank Amsterdam

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

    Defendant: Krzystof Marek Poltorak

    Questions referred

    1.

    Are the expressions ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) and ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, autonomous terms of EU law?

    2.

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: what are the criteria for determining whether an authority of the issuing Member State is such a ‘judicial authority’ and whether the EAW issued by it is consequently such a ‘judicial decision’?

    3.

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: is the Swedish National Police Board covered by the term ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, and is the EAW issued by that authority consequently a ‘judicial decision’ within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA?

    4.

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: is the designation of a national police authority, such as the Swedish National Police Board, as the issuing judicial authority in conformity with EU law?

    (1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

    Top