EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015FA0023
Case F-23/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Obligations — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Disciplinary procedure — Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts — Reprimand — Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Consequences of the irregularity)
Case F-23/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Obligations — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Disciplinary procedure — Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts — Reprimand — Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Consequences of the irregularity)
Case F-23/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Obligations — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Disciplinary procedure — Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts — Reprimand — Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Consequences of the irregularity)
IO C 156, 2.5.2016, p. 55–56
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 18/03/2016
- Date lodged:
- 09/02/2015
- Author:
- An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Type of procedure:
- Cásanna foirne - gan bhunús, Caingean chun cúiteamh a ghnóthú - gan bhunús, Cásanna foirne - neamh-inghlactha
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62015FJ0023
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
2.5.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 156/55 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 March 2016 — Kerstens v Commission
(Case F-23/15) (1)
((Civil Service - Officials - Obligations - Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service - Dissemination of insulting remarks with regard to another official - Article 12 of the Staff Regulations - Disciplinary procedure - Enquiry in the form of an examination of the facts - Reprimand - Article 9(1)(b) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Consequences of the irregularity))
(2016/C 156/77)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision to impose a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand on the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Petrus Kerstens to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 42.
