This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015CN0616
Case C-616/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
Case C-616/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
Case C-616/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
IO C 98, 14.3.2016, p. 17–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 20/11/2015
- Date lodged:
- 20/11/2015
- Author:
- An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Gearmáinis
- Type of procedure:
- Caingean mar gheall ar mhainneachtain oibleagáidí a chomhall
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- request to establish failure to fulfil an obligation 32006L0112 airteagal 132 mír 1 pointe (f)
- Link
|
14.3.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 98/17 |
Action brought on 20 November 2015 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-616/15)
(2016/C 098/22)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Owsiany-Hornung and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
1. |
declare that, by restricting, to groups whose members exercise a limited number of professions, the exemption from VAT for the supply by independent groups of persons carrying on an activity which is exempt from VAT, or in relation to which they are not taxable persons, of services to their members for the direct purposes of the exercise of that activity where those groups merely claim from their members exact reimbursement of their share of the joint expenses, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 132(1)(f) of the VAT directive; (1) |
|
2. |
order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following:
Germany restricts to certain well-defined professions the exemption from VAT for the supply of services by independent groups of persons carrying on an activity which is exempt from VAT, or in relation to which they are not taxable persons, for the direct purposes of the exercise of that activity. The exemption under the German law on VAT covers solely groups whose members are either doctors or health professionals and hospitals or establishments similar to hospitals.
This is incompatible with Article 132(1)(f) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax. Neither the wording, purpose, nor preparatory work leading to the adoption of Article 132(1)(f) of Directive 2006/112/EC justifies such a restriction of the exemption from VAT to groups from certain professions. The exemption should, however, apply to groups from all professions provided that they exercise tax-exempt professions.
The restriction under the German law on VAT is also not justified by a potential general distortion of competition. This is because, as far as tax exemptions are concerned, the presence or absence of a distortion of competition can only apply with regard to the specific facts of a given case. Distortions of competition cannot be assessed in the abstract for certain professions of a group and services provided in connection with those professions.
(1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
