EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014TN0194
Case T-194/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
Case T-194/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
Case T-194/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
IO C 151, 19.5.2014, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 20/03/2014
- Date lodged:
- 20/03/2014
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Béarla
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.5.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 151/33 |
Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
(Case T-194/14)
2014/C 151/42
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Bristol Global Co. Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Bozhinova, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bridgestone Corp. (Tokyo, Japan)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 December 2013 given in Case R 916/2013-2. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘AEROSTONE’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 10 066 736
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks registrations of the word marks ‘STONE’ for goods in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 and ‘BRIDGESTONE’ for goods in Class 12; well-known trade mark and non-registered sign containing verbal element ‘BRIDGESTONE’
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) CTMR.
