This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0254
Case T-254/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Stayer Ibérica/OHIM — Korporaciya Masternet (STAYER)
Case T-254/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Stayer Ibérica/OHIM — Korporaciya Masternet (STAYER)
Case T-254/13: Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Stayer Ibérica/OHIM — Korporaciya Masternet (STAYER)
IO C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 40–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 10–10
(HR)
20.7.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 207/40 |
Action brought on 6 May 2013 — Stayer Ibérica/OHIM — Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (STAYER)
(Case T-254/13)
2013/C 207/68
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Stayer Ibérica, SA (Pinto, Spain) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’ (Moscow, Russia)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul the contested decision in so far as it upholds the appeal in part and declares the CTM registration No 4675881 invalid for the following goods:
|
— |
Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark ‘STAYER’ — Community trade mark registration No 4 675 881
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds for the request for a declaration of invalidity were those of Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for invalidity in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially upheld the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 76(2), 15 and 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.