Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013CN0312

    Case C-312/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 7 June 2013 — Claudiu Roșu v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a Județului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală

    IO C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    IO C 226, 3.8.2013, p. 3–3 (HR)

    3.8.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 226/7


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 7 June 2013 — Claudiu Roșu v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a Județului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală

    (Case C-312/13)

    (2013/C 226/11)

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Claudiu Roșu

    Defendant: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a Județului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală

    Question referred

    If a vendor has been reclassified as a taxable person for VAT purposes and the consideration for (price of) the supply of the immovable property has been determined by the parties, without any reference to VAT, must Articles 73 and 78 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the taxable amount is:

    (a)

    the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property determined by the parties, less the rate of VAT, or

    (b)

    the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property agreed by the parties?


    (1)  Council Directive of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).


    Top