Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012CN0388

    Case C-388/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche (Italy), lodged on 16 August 2012 — Comune di Ancona v Regione Marche

    IO C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 4–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    16/08/2012
    Date lodged:
    16/08/2012
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Iodáilis
    Type of procedure:
    Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • request for interpretation 31999R1260 airteagal 30 P4
    Link

    20.10.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 319/4

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche (Italy), lodged on 16 August 2012 — Comune di Ancona v Regione Marche

    (Case C-388/12)

    2012/C 319/06

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Comune di Ancona

    Defendant: Regione Marche

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must Article 30(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (1) be interpreted as meaning that it is not possible to undertake an assessment of whether the assignment results in substantial income for the contracting authority and undue advantages for the concession-holder without first establishing whether the project has undergone substantial modification?

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative:

    (a)

    Does that provision refer only to physical modifications — in the sense that the structure set in place is not as specified in relation to the project approved for funding — or does it also include modifications in regard to function and, in the latter case, has there been substantial modification if the structure is used ‘also’ — but not predominantly — for activities other than those envisaged in the notice or in the application to participate in the notice?

    If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:

    (b)

    Does that provision, with reference to those cases in which the public funding is used to carry out works the management of which is likely to be financially significant, apply only at the stage when the project is being carried out, or does the requirement to comply with the rules on a competitive tendering procedure also continue to apply when the project management is assigned?

    2.

    Must Article 30(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 be interpreted as meaning that the process of establishing whether contracting out the management to third parties actually gives rise to substantial net income or positions of undue advantage for a firm or public body constitutes a stage which, logically and legally, follows on after the preliminary question (that is to say, the question whether a competitive tendering procedure must be held), or must account also be taken, in determining the existence of the obligation to hold a competitive tendering procedure, of the actual rules governing the contractual relationship?

    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1).

    Top