Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012CN0369

    Case C-369/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central, representing Constantin Chițea and Others v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Brașov

    IO C 343, 10.11.2012, p. 5–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    02/08/2012
    Date lodged:
    02/08/2012
    Author:
    An Chúirt Bhreithiúnais
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Rómáinis
    Type of procedure:
    Tarchur le haghaidh réamhrialú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Case affecting:
    • request for interpretation 12010P017 Str. 1 L2
    • request for interpretation 12010P017 Str. 1 L3
    • request for interpretation 12010P051 Str. 1 L2
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    10.11.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 343/5

    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central, representing Constantin Chițea and Others v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Brașov

    (Case C-369/12)

    2012/C 343/04

    Language of the case: Romanian

    Referring court

    Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania)

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicants: Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central, representing Constantin Chițea and Others

    Defendants: Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Brașov

    Questions referred

    1.

    Must the second sentence of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted, with reference to Article 20 of that Charter, as meaning that employees paid from public funds have the same rights as the employees of commercial companies which are State-owned or subsidised by the State budget?

    2.

    Must the second sentence of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted, with reference to Article 21(1) of that Charter, as precluding discrimination between employees paid from public funds and employees of commercial companies which are State-owned or subsidised by the State budget?

    3.

    Must the phrase ‘his or her possessions’ (with reference to citizens) in the second sentence of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as also covering remuneration rights?

    4.

    Must the phrase ‘in the public interest’ in the second sentence of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as relating to ‘economic crisis’?

    5.

    Must the words ‘use of property. in so far as is necessary for the general interest’ in the third sentence of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as covering a ‘25 % reduction of the salaries of public sector employees’?

    6.

    If the Romanian State were to reduce by 25 % the remuneration of employees paid from public funds, citing as justification the economic crisis and the need to balance the State budget, would that mean that, subsequently, in accordance with the second sentence of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the State would be under an obligation to pay those employees fair compensation in good time for the loss sustained?
    Top