This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0274
Case T-274/11 P: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — VE (*) v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Contractual agents — Expatriation allowance — Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Notion of habitual residence — Distortion of the facts — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
Case T-274/11 P: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — VE (*) v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Contractual agents — Expatriation allowance — Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Notion of habitual residence — Distortion of the facts — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
Case T-274/11 P: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — VE (*) v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Contractual agents — Expatriation allowance — Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Notion of habitual residence — Distortion of the facts — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
IO C 39, 11.2.2012, p. 14–14
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 07/12/2011
- Date lodged:
- 25/05/2011
- Author:
- Cúirt Ghinearálta
- Form:
- Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
- Authentic language:
- Fraincis
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 31968R0259-N7A04
- 62011TN0274
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
11.2.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 39/14 |
Order of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — VE (*1) v Commission
(Case T-274/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Contractual agents - Expatriation allowance - Conditions imposed by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Notion of habitual residence - Distortion of the facts - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
(2012/C 39/28)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant(s): VE (*1) (represented by L. Vogel, lawyer)
Other party/parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2011 in Case F-28/10 VE (*1) v Commission [2011] ECR-SC I-A-I-0000 and II-A-1-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
VE (*1) will bear his own costs and will pay those incurred by the European Commission on the appeal. |
(*1) Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
