Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011FN0103

    Case F-103/11: Action brought on 11 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB

    IO C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 25–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    11/10/2011
    Date lodged:
    11/10/2011
    Author:
    An Binse um Sheirbhís Shibhialta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Fraincis

    7.1.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 6/25

    Action brought on 11 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB

    (Case F-103/11)

    2012/C 6/46

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Thieltgen, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Investment Bank

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of the decision of the President of the EIB not to take any action following the inquiry concerning alleged psychological harassment and to annul the final conclusion of the committee of inquiry and the claim for damages.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the final conclusion of the committee of inquiry in its Opinion of 11 July 2011 in so far as it states that there are no facts that can be classified as harassment in respect of the applicant;

    —

    annul the decision of the President of the EIB of 27 July 2011;

    —

    find that she was and is the victim of harassment;

    —

    direct the EIB to put an end to that harassment;

    —

    annul the decision of the President of the EIB of 1 September 2011;

    —

    find that there has been maladministration on the part of the EIB;

    —

    find that the EIB is liable vis-à-vis the applicant as regards the illegality of the decision of the President of the EIB of 27 July 2011, the harassment which she suffered and maladministration on the part of the EIB;

    —

    order the EIB to pay compensation for past and future physical, material and non-material damage caused to the applicant as a result of the illegality of the decision of the President of the EIB of 27 July 2011, the psychological harassment she suffered and maladministration on the part of the EIB, together with default interest;

    —

    with regard to the unlawfulness of the President’s letter of 27 July 2011:

    —

    material damage due to loss of earnings: EUR 113 100;

    —

    non-material damage: EUR 50 000

    —

    with regard to the psychological harassment she suffered:

    —

    material damage in respect of earnings and loss of career: EUR 132 100;

    —

    non-material damage: EUR 50 000;

    —

    associated costs: EUR 13 361,93;

    —

    with regard to maladministration on the part of the EIB:

    —

    breach by the EIB of its obligation of confidentiality and data protection: EUR 10 000;

    —

    incident regarding the examination of witnesses: EUR 40 000;

    —

    order the EIB to pay the costs.
    Top