Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CA0461

    Case C-461/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski v Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm (Freedom of movement for workers — Article 45 TFEU — Total or partial debt relief procedure — Debtor who is a natural person — National legislation making the grant of debt relief subject to a residence condition)

    IO C 9, 12.1.2013, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    12.1.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 9/20


    Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski v Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm

    (Case C-461/11) (1)

    (Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Total or partial debt relief procedure - Debtor who is a natural person - National legislation making the grant of debt relief subject to a residence condition)

    2013/C 9/31

    Language of the case: Swedish

    Referring court

    Stockholms tingsrätt

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski

    Defendant: Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm

    Re:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Stockholms tingsrätt — Interpretation of Article 45 TFEU — Freedom of movement for persons — Compatibility with Article 45 TFEU of national legislation making the grant of debt relief proceedings in respect of natural persons subject to a condition of residence in national territory — Debtor who is a national of Member State A, resident in Member State B, having made an application for debt relief in Member State A, the place of origin of his debts — Links with the place the application was made

    Operative part of the judgment

    Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the grant of debt relief subject to a condition of residence in the Member State concerned.


    (1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.


    Top