Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010TN0236

    Case T-236/10: Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission

    IO C 195, 17.7.2010, p. 31–31 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    21/05/2010
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Spáinnis

    17.7.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 195/31

    Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Asociación Española de Banca v Commission

    (Case T-236/10)

    2010/C 195/49

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Asociación Española de Banca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Form of order sought

    —

    annul Article 1(1) of the contested decision inasmuch as it declares that Article 12(5) of the consolidated text of the Law on Corporation Tax (texto refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre Sociedades, TRLIS) involves State aid elements;

    —

    in the alternative, annul Article 1(1) inasmuch as it declares that Article 12(5) TRLIS involves State aid elements when it applies to acquisitions of shares which entail the acquisition of control;

    —

    in the alternative, annul Article 4 inasmuch as it applies the recovery order to operations which occurred prior to the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the final decision which is the object of the present action, and

    —

    order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The decision against which these proceedings are brought is the same as that contested in Cases T-219/10 Autogrill España v Commission; T-221/10 IBERDROLA v Commission; and T-225/10 BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA v Commission.

    The pleas in law and the principal arguments are similar to those relied on in those cases.

    Top