EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FB0059
Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility)
Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility)
Case F-59/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice (Civil Service — Preliminary issues — Plea of inadmissibility — Complaint out of time — Inadmissibility)
IO C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.5.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/29 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 May 2011 — Barthel, Reiffers and Massez v Court of Justice
(Case F-59/10) (1)
(Civil Service - Preliminary issues - Plea of inadmissibility - Complaint out of time - Inadmissibility)
(2012/C 138/63)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Yvette Barthel (Arlon, Belgium), Marianne Reiffers (Olm, Luxembourg) and Lieven Massez (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Justice (represented by: A. V. Placco, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice rejecting the claim by the applicants for payment of the allowance for continuous work or shiftwork provided for in the first indent of Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976, determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shiftwork, and the rates and conditions thereof (OJ 1976 L 38, p. 1)
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
2. |
The Court of Justice of the European Union is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by the applicants. |