This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CO0032
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2011.#Tony Georgiev Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Varhoven kasatsionen sad - Bulgaria.#Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred.#Case C-32/10.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2011.
Tony Georgiev Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Varhoven kasatsionen sad - Bulgaria.
Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred.
Case C-32/10.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2011.
Tony Georgiev Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva.
Reference for a preliminary ruling: Varhoven kasatsionen sad - Bulgaria.
Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred.
Case C-32/10.
Thuarascálacha na Cúirte Eorpaí 2011 I-00071*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2011:288
*A9* Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgarie), Reshenie 30/12/2009 (222/2009)
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 May 2011 – Semerdzhiev v Del-Pi-Krasimira Mancheva
(Case C-32/10)
Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure – Directive 90/314/EEC – Package travel, package holidays and package tours – Facts preceding the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria to the European Union – Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court to answer the questions referred
Preliminary rulings – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Interpretation of a Community directive in proceedings antedating the accession of a Member State to the European Union – Not included (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 25-27)
Re
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Varhoven kasatsionen sad – Interpretation of Articles 2(1)(c), 4(1)(b)(iv) and 5(2)(3) and (4) of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ 1990 L 158, p. 59) – Concept of ‘other tourist services’ not ancillary to transport or accommodation to be borne by the organiser – Obligation of the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract for each consumer and to provide the consumer with the original before travel – Obligation of the organiser to conclude an individual insurance contract covering costs of repatriation in case of accident – Concept of ‘damage’ resulting for the consumer from the failure to perform or the improper performance of the contract – Non-material damages included. |
Operative part
The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the questions referred by the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria).